Hincks & Johnson was a little-known
Bridgeport carriage
builder that produced wooden automobile bodies for early Locomobiles.
The firm
had a long history of producing automobile coachwork, their first known
automobile customer being Manhattan’s John Chester De La Vergne for
whom they
constructed a couple of bodies in 1895. The firm was best known for
their sturdy carriages and Hansom cabs which were sold to
Manhattan’s elite through their 146 E 41st St. wareroom,
which was
managed by Charles W. Rivers.
Their direct predecssor, Wood Brothers, was far
better known, in no small part due to their having supplied carriages
for three successive US Presidents; Abraham Lincoln, Andrew Johnson
& Ulysses S. Grant.
Hincks & Johnson can trace their roots
to Tomlinson,
Wood & Company, an early Bridgeport builder of heavy carriages
founded in
1828 by brothers Stephen (b. 1804) and Russell (b. 1807) Tomlinson and
David A.
Wood (b. 1806-d. 1874).
David Augustus Wood was born on May 22, 1806
(d. Sep. 4,
1874) in Danbury Township, Fairfield County, Connecticut to David (b.
Dec. 23,
1781-d. Mar. 8, 1867) and Betsey Hoyt (b. 1786-1855) Wood.
The 1870 Census lists David A. Wood (b. 1806
- 64yo) as a
resident of New York City, his occupation retired carriage builder. In
the
‘value of real estate owned’ column he provides $200,000 under the
‘real
estate’ heading and $20,000 under the ‘personal estate’ heading. Also
listed in
the same household is his brother Charles B. Wood (b.1821 -48yo),
occupation
coach builder and David A. Wood’s son F. Charles Wood (b. 1849 - 21yo),
his
occupation clerk.
In 1834 Tomlinson and Wood took in a third
partner, Jeremiah
Judson, and erected a new carriage factory on Broad Street near the
head of
Cannon. The partners business became highly successful and on May 16,
1842
Stephen Tomlinson received US Patent No. 2624
for a spring perch for carriages.
On January 1, 1846 a group of Bridgeport
businessmen
organized the Spring Perch Company to exploit Tomlinsons’s patent.
Capitalized
at $25,000, its shareholders included Eli Gilbert, Joseph C. Lewis,
Samuel W.
Phelps, and Edwin Porter Jr. The firm was eventually taken over by
executives
of the Bridgeport Savings Bank, its success spawning a subsidiary, the
Bridgeport Elastic Web Co. The firm’s products proved useful to the
automobile industry,
and a Buffalo, New York branch was later established, the firm
remaining in
business into the Second World War.
Jeremiah Judson’s share in Tomlinson, Wood
& Company was
eventually taken over by Frederick Wood (b. Aug. 22, 1815-d. Oct. 21,
1877), David
A. Wood’s younger brother and on April 1, 1846 the two pairs of
brothers reorganized
the firm as a $100,000 joint stock company, its incorporators being
Stephen and
Russell Tomlinson and David A. and Frederick Wood.
Although they weren’t listed, David and
Frederick's two
brothers, Nathaniel C. (b. 1809), and Charles (b. Feb. 10, 1822) Wood
were also
involved with the firm. During that period Tomlinson, Wood,
& Co.
became the most extensive carriage builders in
Bridgeport, and
by the end of the decade had established a Manhattan repository in the
old
Apollo Hall at 410 Broadway, and a repair shop on Courtland alley, both
of
which were conducted in the style of Wood Bros., with no mention of the
Tomlinsons.
The 1850 US Census reveals that the Woods
had mostly
relocated to Manhattan by that time. Included in the census were;
Nathaniel
C. Wood (b.1809 – 41yo), carriage manufacturer; David A. Wood (43yo),
carriage
manufacturer (and his wife Sarah, 37yo); Frederick (34yo), carriage
manufacturer (and his wife Elizabeth, 30yo); Charles F. Wood (28yo),
carriage
manufacturer. Also included were the Wood brother’s parents, David (68yo)
and Betsey
(63yo) Wood.
Unlike his other brothers, Frederick maintained a Bridgeport
residence up to the end of his life, and he
appears in the 1850 US Census as a resident of both Bridgeport and
Manhattan.
His Bridgeport listing being; Frederick Wood (35yo), carriage
manufacturer;
Elizabeth (30yo) his wife, and their two sons, Augustus N (b. 1842 - 8yo) and
Charles
Frederick (b. 1849 - 1yo)
In 1854 the Tomlinson brothers sold their
share in Tomlinson,
Wood & Company and organized two new firms; the Tomlinson Spring
& Axle
Co., headed by Russell Tomlinson; and the Tomlinson Carriage Co., a
$30,000 joint
stock company organized on April 15, 1854; headed by Stephen Tomlinson,
with George
K. Groot, secretary and sales agent. The
second generation of the Tomlinson family; Mark, Monson H., and William
Tomlinson, were also involved in the two enterprises.
The Tomlinson Carriage company erected a
four story
manufactory, 121 by 50 feet at 38-46 John Street, Bridgeport. The
first story (all
were 10’ high) held the smith-shop with eight forges in the center, and
one
large chimney running up forty feet above the roof; a passageway and
stairway
in its center; and the remainder divided into an office, stock-room,
and
show-room. The second story was used for a wood-shop and turning-room,
the
third story was for ironing, painting and varnishing and the fourth
floor for
the storage of material and finished vehicles.
The Tomlinson Spring & Axle Co, was
situated across the
street from the Carriage factory on Cannon St. Both shops maintained a
good
relationship with the Wood Bros., who served as their exclusive New
York City agents
at 410 Broadway; and in Boston, Dudley H. Bayley, 91 Federal street,
served in
a similar capacity.
The 1857-1858 Bridgeport & East
Bridgeport Directory
reveals that even at that late date the Wood Brothers’ Broad and Cannon
St.’s
factory continued to be operated in the style of Tomlinson, Wood &
Co.:
“Tomlinson Carriage Co., 38 to 46 John.
Tomlinson, Wood & Co., Broad c. Cannon.”
One period accounts claims that the Wood
Brothers Bridgeport
facility was managed by Z.M. Miller (Zephaniah Mills Miller,
b.1811-d.1888), a
longtime Bridgeport wagon and carriage builder. The 1850 US Census
lists his occupation as wagon maker, the 1880 US Census, carriage
builder. His exact business relationship with the Woods is currently unknown.
The Wood Brothers exhibited a group of
carriages at the 1858
Fair of the American Institute, which was held at New York’s Crystal
Palace.
All was lost when the cast iron and plate glass exhibition hall
famously burned
to the ground on Oct 5, 1858.
The May 30, 1863 issue of Harpers Weekly
announced that Wood
Brothers had moved from 410 Broadway to 594-596 Broadway:
“REMOVAL. WOOD
BROTHERS, Carriage Manufacturers, have removed to Nos. 594 and 596
Broadway, a few doors above Niblo's.”
The firm prospered and Frederick became a
leading member of
the Carriage Builders' National Association who referred to him in
their 1897
history as “one of the brightest men ever connected with the carriage
industry”.
Frederick Wood was a personal friend of P.T.
Barnum and when
Abraham Lincoln visited Bridgeport on March 10, 1860, the President
enjoyed a
fried oyster dinner with the Wood family at their 67 Washington Ave.
(at
Coleman St.) mansion. While at the Wood home Lincoln complained
about the
seating on the trains he had been traveling on and commented he liked
the chair
he was sitting on at the Wood home. The chair in question was lent to
the
President for the remainder of his journey.
In 1864 a group of New York merchants
presented a Wood Bros.
Barouche to the President just prior to the inauguration of his second
term*. Equipped
with six springs and solid silver lamps, door handles and hubcaps, the
stylish
Barouche (a 4-passenger vehicle descended from the 2-wheeled Caleche)
included
steps that automatically lowered when the doors were opened (and raised
when
they were closed).
*(Another source claims it was privately
purchased by
President and Mrs. Lincoln in 1864, who were subsequently reimbursed
for its
cost by Congress.)
On the night of April 14, 1865, President
and Mrs. Lincoln
journeyed to Ford’s Theater in the very same vehicle accompanied by
Major Henry
Rathbone and Miss Clara Harris to see a performance of ‘Our American
Cousin’, during
which John Wilkes Booth mortally wounded the President, who died the
next day.
Abraham Lincoln’s son, Robert later sold the Barouche to F.
B. Brewer of New York, after which it was sold to Clement Studebaker,
who shipped
it to the Studebaker Bros. Michigan Ave Carriage Repository, where it
was first
placed on display in August 1890, one of the very first vehicles
included in the
Studebaker Corporation's historic vehicles collection. The vehicle was
recently
restored to its original condition by B.R. Howard & Associates,
Inc. of
Carlisle, Pennsylvania, and remains the centerpiece of the Studebaker
Museum’s
collection.
The September 20, 1864 issue of the New York Times reported on a fire at the Wood Bros. repository:
“Large Fire in Broadway.
“Between 3 and 4 o'clock yesterday morning a
fire broke out
on the third floor of the building known as No. 596 Broadway, just
above the
Metropolitan Hotel, near Houston street. Owing to the time in the
morning at
which the alarm was given, and the further fact that many of the
firemen had
not returned from a fire uptown, considerable time elapsed from the
first
striking of the bells, before there was much force of firemen on the
ground. The
flames spread with great rapidity, and soon all the upper portion of
the
extensive building extending through to Crosby street, was one sheet of
flame.
“The first floor was occupied by Messrs.
WOOD, BROTHERS
& CO., as a carriage repository. By dint of almost superhuman
exertions
they succeeded in saving nearly all of their extensive stock of
carriages Some
of them were however slightly damaged by water. The Messrs. WOOD are
fully
insured.”
An
advertisement in the October 14, 1864 issue of the New York Semi-Weekly
Times revelas the set up temporary accomodations in the Sanitary Fair
exhibition hall located on the grounds of Manhattan's Palace Garden
which was established in 1858:
“Carriages at Bargains.
“At the ‘Palace Garden,’ 14th-st., near
6th-av., SANITARY
FAIR BUILDING, on exhibition, and offered for sale, WOOD BROTHERS
immense stock
of Carriages, embracing the newest and most fashionable styles in use,
from the
finest coach through all the varieties of Park Carriage to the lightest
Trotting Wagon.
“That portion of the stock damage at the
late fire will be
sold at greatly reduced prices, and their new stock proportionately
reduced to
the gold standard.”
The November 5, 1864 issue of Harpers Weekly
included the
following advertisement which reveals they were also agents for Albany, New York's James Goold Co.:
“WOOD BROTHERS' Immense Stock of Carriages
on Exhibition and
for Sale at the PALACE GARDEN, Fourteenth Street, near Sixth Avenue
(SANITARY
FAIR BUILDING). Embracing the newest and most fashionable styles, from
the
finest Coach, through all the varieties of Park Carriages, to the
lightest
Trotting-Wagon. That portion of the stock damaged by the late fire will
be sold
at greatly-reduced price, and their new stock proportionately reduced
to the
gold standard. WOOD BROTHERS are Agents for the sale of GOOLD'S ALBANY
Sleighs.
A full assortment of these celebrated Sleighs will be found in our
stock.”
Lincoln’s Vice-President, Andrew Johnson,
became President
after Lincoln’s assassination, and he too was an owner of a Wood
Brother’s
carriage. In ‘The Papers of Andrew Johnson, Volume 8, May - August
1865, pub.
1989, Lincoln Paul H. Bergeron includes
the following letter:
“From John Rice, 129 South 7th Street,
Philadelphia
His Excellency Andrew Johnson
President USA
Dear Sir.
At the request of General Mussey, I have
purchased for
you from Wood Brothers, New York, a carriage including slip linings and
Stable
cover, for the sum of $1550 – (The original prices was $2000.) and have
ordered
them to ship it, by the most convenient and safe route, and requested
them to
transmit Bill of lading &c direct to you.
Messrs. Beckhuas & Allgaier, to whom
you gave the
order to build a carriage, claim that they will be damaged at least
$100 - by
countermanding the Order. As the price of one bought in New York is as
much
below the price they ask, you will loose nothing by the transaction.
Hopeing it will please you, and the use
of it assist in
relieving the cares of your official duties.
I remain your obedient Servt.,
John Rice
(Two week later, Johnson sent a check to
Charles B and
Frederick R. Wood, New York City)”
Wood
Bros. continued to use the Sanitary Fair building as their repository
into late April of 1865 at which time the disposed of their old stock
in an acution that was advertised in the General City News column of
the March
29, 1865 New York
Times:
“LARGE SALE OF CARRIAGES. -- Messrs. WOOD
BROTHERS, the well
known carriage manufacturers, will dispose of their entire stock by
public
auction on Wednesday and Thursday evenings next, at their repository in
Fourth-street near the Sixth-avenue. (Palace Garden.) The stock
contains nearly
one hundred and fifty carriages, many of them of the most fashionable
styles,
and made expressly for this market. The clarences, coupes and phaetons
are
particularly worthy of attention, being finished in the most costly and
recherche manner. Immediately after the sale, the firm will resume
business at
its old stand No. 596 Broadway with a large and entirely new stock.”
An
advertisment in the April 6, 1865 New York Times states they had
resumed operations at their No. 596 Broadway repository:
“Fine Carriages.
“WOOD BROTHERS, Carriage Manufacturers, No.
596 Broadway,
N.Y., having, since the late fire, made a clearing out sale at auction,
of all
their old goods, and resumed business at their old stand, No. 596
Broadway,
with an entire fresh stock, made especially for the Spring trade, from
new
models of the most fashionable pleasure carriages now in use, are
prepared to
sell at greatly reduced prices. Style, fashion, beauty of model,
excellence in
workmanship, and durability are the characteristics of their work, and
they
believe in these particulars it stands unrivaled by any made upon the
continent.
“WOOD BROTHERS, No. 596 Broadway, N.Y.”
The Wood Bros.' 92 Crosby street workshop was damaged by fire on Dec. 17, 1865, the December 18, 1865 New York Times reporting:
“Fires.; IN CROSBY-STREET.
“Between 8 and 9 o'clock Saturday evening, a
fire broke out
at No. 92 Crosby-street, a five-story building, occupied by WOOD
BROTHERS,
carriage manufacturers, as a workshop. The flames were first discovered
among
some paints and oils, but were kept well under by the persistent
efforts of the
firemen, who were early on the ground. The damage to the stock is about
$1,000;
the building is damaged by fire and water $250. Both losses are fully
covered
by insurance.”
In 1870 newly-elected US President Ulysses
S. Grant
commissioned Wood Bros. to build him a carriage of his own design,
becoming the
third successive US President to do so. The style was that of the
hunting carriage
or dog cart, a sturdy 4-passenger vehicle with built-in kennels beneath
the
tonneau that included provisions for food and beverage underneath the
driver’s
seat.
Wood Bros. also produced small numbers of
wood-wheeled bicycles
(aka boneshakers for their unpleasant ride) in the period immediately
following
the end of the Civil War. One surviving example is on display at the
Velocipede
Museum in New Castle, Delaware, whose description of it follows:
“WOODS BROTHERS BONESHAKER, YEAR 1869
SPRING SEAT AND BRASS PEDALS, FORGED IRON BACKBONE, WOOD WHEELS WITH
METAL
BEARINGS
PRICED AT $135.00 IN THAT ERA.”
The
June 1858 issue of the New York
Coachmaker’s Magazine
indicates that another coachbuilder named Wood (Fred. R. Wood Co.) was
operating a competing firm on West Ninteenth street. Although they
shared a
surname, the
two firms were totally unrelated.
The Fred. R. Wood Co. was established in
1848 by Frederick
R. Wood* (b. 1825), a native New Yorker who established a Manhattan
wareroom
and manufactory at 219-221 West 19th St., under the style of Fred. R.
Wood
& Co. during 1848.
*(Not to be confused with the Manhattan
realtor, Frederick
R. Wood (b.1868-d.1924) who built up a large commercial real
estate
business as F.R. Wood & Co. He took on a partner, William Hamilton
Dolson (1880-1926), in 1911, forming the Wood, Dolson Co. which
survived
under various iterations until 1968.)
Trow’s 1872 New York City Directory lists
both
carriagemakers as follows:
“Wood Brothers Co., carriages, 740 Broadway
& 58
Lafayette Pl.
“Wood, Frederick R., carriages, 219 W. 19th,
h. 446 W 20th,”
In
late 1869 The Wood Bros. purchased a LaFayette Place plot at 740-742
Broadway running through to Astor Place upon which they erected a
5-story carriage manufactory and repository. Whilst under construction,
the building suffered a
partial collapse, a fact mentioned in the following 'concerned citizen'
letter published by the New York Herald in its April 15, 1870 issue:
“A Dangerous Building
“To the editor of the Herald
“Through your valuable paper we wish to call
the immediate attention
of the inspector of buildings, if we have any, to the very dangerous
condition
of the large building erected by Wood Brothers for a carriage
manufactory on
Broadway near Astor Place, running through to Lafayette Place. It is
five
stories high with very light walls. About 100 feet of the north wall
fell of its
own weight a few days ago, with a crash. The remainder of the wall near
Broadway has bulged out and is propped up with timbers, the ends
resting on the
Stuyvesant Bank building. The neighbors are afraid of the lives, as
they expect
it to fall at any time. The owners and builders should be prosecuted
and made
to pay any damages for erecting such a shell of a building, and the
inspector
of Buildings should compel them to remove the dangerous structure
immediately.
By policing the above you will greatly oblige many in the neighborhood.
“Subscriber.”
A
detailed report of the collapse was published in the April 17, 1870
issue of the New York Times, included below are the first few
paragraphs:
“THE FALLEN BUILDING.; The Recent Accident
at Wood Brother's
Carriage Warehouse--Result of the Inspection Yesterday--The Official
Report.
“The inspection which was adjourned from
Wednesday last of
the fallen building in Lafayette-place, now in process of erection as a
carriage warehouse for Wood Brothers, was continued yesterday, and the
report
of the Committee will be found below. Another inspection is to take
place during
the coming week, to ascertain, if possible, the cause of the disaster.
This was
not done yesterday, from the fact that the foundation of the fallen
wall is so
covered with debris that it was found impossible to obtain a fair view
of the
under structure. It is thought by Superintendent MacGregor, and other
practical
mechanics, that water running from the roof during the recent heavy
Spring
rains so undermined the foundation walls as to lead to the disastrous
results
which followed.”
During
the consequent delay in construction, Wood Bros. leased a portion of
the 22nd Regiment Armory as a repository as stated in the following
display advertisement published on the front page
of the May 28,
1870 New York Herald:
“Astonishingly Low Prices. Wood Brothers are
offering their
stock of fine carriages at the armory of the Twenty-second regiment,
Fourteenth
street, between Sixth and Seventh avenues, at great bargains, among
which are a
few second-hand carriages at the astonishingly low prices mentioned
below:
“Two wheel dog cart $200; Open Ensembles for
six persons
$260 to $480; Light Open Coaches $500; Open ‘Four-In-Hand’ Carriages
$350; Four
seat Park Phaetons $310; Six seat Park Phaetons $340; Fine Clarences,
with silk
linings $1800; Elegant Closed Coaches $2,000; Cabriolets $2,400. ‘Tea’
Carts,
Top Buggies, Pony Phaetons, &c., at great bargains. Wood Brothers,
armory
Twenty-second regiment, Fourteenth street between Sixth and Seventh
avenues.”
The collapsed wall was rebuilt and the new
repository and
warerooms opened during the first week of August of 1870, the August
2nd issue
of the New York Herald included the following classified:
“A Superb Eight-Spring Paris-Made Landau, at
less than the
cost of Importation, for sale by Wood Brothers & Co., at their new
warerooms,
740 Broadway, one block below Astor place. Other elegant Paris made
Carriages
equally cheap. French carriages imported to order. A fine 8 spring
Landau, $1,150.”
Wood Bros. suffered a $75,000 loss on
February 1, 1873, the
Spectator Insurance Yearbook for 1874 reporting:
“An iron front building on Broadway New York
occupied by an
upholstering firm was damaged by fire $300,000 Wood Bros carriage
makers lost
$75,000.”
The February 2, 1873 issue of the New York Times reporting:
“Destructive Fire in Broadway Loss Estimated
at $500,000.
“Shortly before 3 o’clock, yesterday
morning, Patrolman Brennan
of the Fifteenth Precinct, noticed smoke coming issuing from the second
story
windows of Nos. 740 and 742 Broadway. He sent out an alarm, which was
promptly
responded to be detachments of the police, Fired Department and
Insurance
Patrol. The doors of the building were with difficulty forced open,
when it was
discovered that the second floor was enveloped in flames. The firemen
woo had
several streams of water playing on the fire, and in the meantime the
police
and insurance patrolmen exerted themselves in saving property in the
lower part
of the building. The first floor of the premises is occupied by the
Wood Bros.,
carriage-makers, and was filled with a valuable assortment of carriages
and
sleighs. The doors on Broadway and Lafayette place were thrown open,
and under
the direction of Capt. Byrnes, of the Fifteenth Precinct, much property
was
saved. In the meantime the flames had spread very rapidly throughout
the second
floor of the building, and before they could be extinguished had
extended to
the third and first floors, causing an immense loss. The second floor
was
occupied by Nicol, Cowlishaw & Co., importers of and dealers in
upholstery
and carriage trimmings. They estimate their loss at $300,000 in gold,
and they
have an insurance of $235,000, gold, principally in foreign companies.
The
third floor is occupied by A. Ingalls, upholsterer; loss on stock,
$5,000;
fully insured. Wood Brothers occupy the first floor and basement of the
building. They estimate their loss on stock at $75,000; covered by
insurance.
The building is owned by Wood Brothers and is damaged to the extent of
$20,000;
fully insured. The fire is supposed to have originated from a grate
fire
igniting the floor beams.”
The eldest Wood brother, David Augustus Wood, passed away on September 4, 1874, the Obituary column of the September 7, 1874 New
York Times reporting:
“Wood – Suddenly, on Friday, Sept. 4, David
Augustus Wood,
formerly of the firm of Wood Brothers, in the 69th year of
his age.
The relatives and friends of the family are invited to attend the
funeral
services at his late residence, No. 33 West 23rd St., on
Monday, Sept.
7, at 10 A.M. The remains will be taken for interment to Bridgeport,
Conn.
where carriages will be waiting on the arrival of the 1 o’clock train
from New York.”
After hiss passing his younger brothers assumed
control of the firm's Manhattan operations, a sample ‘Holiday Goods’
advertising supplement is transcribed below that appeared in the
December 24,
1875 New York Times:
“Wood Brothers, of No. 740 Broadway, are
selling at a large
discount from former prices their fine stock of richly-finished
carriages, of
the best quality only, and all designed and made by themselves. The
latest
French and English fashions, which rule the carriage, as they do the
dry-goods
market, are reproduced by this firm, and all their carriages are
trimmed with
imported Moroccos and satins, and are guaranteed in all respects the
best
carriages made. The prices at which the firm are selling their stock
are low enough
to come within the meads of comparatively limited incomes; they have
contented
themselves with small profits, depending on quick returns, and have
organized their
business on an economical basis, which enables them to offer a good
article at
a low price. Their large store and show rooms contain as elegant a
display of
carriages and sleighs for Winter use as may be found anywhere, and a
general stock,
from the skeleton-like sulky to the all-containing Rockaway or
wagonette, in
which the largest sort of a picnic party may find accommodation.
Carriages for
the country, for the City; wagons, buggies, broughams, Victorias,
landaus, and
every other style of vehicle, may be found here, as cheap and good as
any purchased
could desire.”
By 1878 David's younger brother Frederick had retired to Bridgeport
and with no successors deemed capable of running the firm, the
Wood family elected to sell off its assets and withdraw from business,
stating it was ncessary to 'settle the estate'.
The firm's 5-year old Broadway manufactory was put up for lease, its
inventory acquired by 5th Avenue's Brown & Pray, who took out
the following advertisement in the April 14, 1878
New York Times:
“CARRIAGES, Brown & Pray offer for sale
at greatly
reduced prices the entire stock of elegant carriages manufactured by
the late
firm of Wood Brothers for less than the cost of construction to close
out the
estate. The stock consists of Landaus, Landaulets, Victorias, Grand
Victorias,
Cabriolets, Vis-à-vis, Coupelets. Ladies Phaetons, Pony Phaetons,
Wagonettes, Park
Drags, Coaches, Broughams, Coupes, Stanhope Phaetons, T Carts, Tandem
Carts,
Stanhope Gigs, Tax Carts, Road Wagons. Brown & Pray, successorts to
Wood
Brothers, Carriage Builders, 84 5th-av. Cor. 14th-st.”
The June 6, 1879 issue of the New York Times
announced a special auction of the firm’s assets:
“The entire stock of carriages of the firm
of Wood Brothers
will be sold at auction, beginning on Wednesday morning next, at No. 84
Fifth
Avenue. The sale is absolute in order to close the estate.”
Wood Brothers’ 740-742 Broadway
warerooms were subsequently
occupied by James Crossley, an importer of all grades of
carpets who was
previously located at 320 and 323 Broadway. He occupied the building
until his 1885
bankruptcy after which it served as the home of Charles Scribners and
Sons who
occupied it until 1888 when it became the home of the Baker &
Taylor Co. a
scholastic book publisher and distributor who occupied it until 1894.
By the turn
of the century it had become the Manhattan branch of the Addressograph
Co.
In May of 1879 the Wood Bros. old Broad Street, Bridgeport, Conn. carriage factory was purchased by Enoch P. Hincks
&
George H.N. Johnson, who reintroduced a similar line of heavy
carriages
(coaches, landaus, coupes, hansoms, etc.) for which the Wood Bros. were
well-known.
The unrelated Frederick R. Wood Co. would enjoy another 60
years manufacturing
vehicle bodies for Manhattan’s elite, under the style of Fred. R. Wood,
Frederick R. Wood & Son, and finally F.R. Wood & Son, Inc.
Hincks and Johnson's operation were well described in the second volume of
Orcutt’s A
History of the Old Town of Stratford and the City of
Bridgeport (pub. 1886):
“Hincks and Johnson, manufacturers of fine
heavy carriages,
such as coaches, landaus, broughams, coupes, hansom cabs, established
their
business on Broad street in May, 1879, as successors to Wood Brothers,
who,
with Stephen and Russell Tomlinson, gained a well-deserved reputation
during
seventeen years of successful labors in the business. Mr. David Wood
was among
the first to commence a manufactory of heavy carriages in this country,
beginning in 1828, under the firm name of Tomlinson, Wood and Company,
Mr.
Hincks is a native of this city, and Mr. Johnson was engaged In New
York for a
term of years before starting the business here. They occupy the
original
edifice built in 1831, with such additions as have been made from time
to time,
and now cover over two acres of ground floor, giving employment to 100
or 150
hands. They turn out complete about 200 of the larger carriages or
coaches
yearly, and of other styles a greater number, being, in fact, the
largest
establishment of the kind in New England and the second in this
country. The
departments for construction in wood and iron work each in itself would
make a
large business. They were the first to introduce recently the
London hansom cabs, making some changes from the English design,
and have
already sold a large number of them in the most populous cities of the
country.
All their business is transacted at the office of their manufactory.”
Hincks & Johnson officers included:
President,
George H. Johnson; vice-president, Enoch P. Hincks; treasurer, William
B.
Hincks ; secretary, H.S. Wilmot ; superintendent, Thomas Boudren.
The firm's president, Enoch Pond Hincks, was born on December 22,
1846 in
Bucksport, Hancock County, Maine to John Winslow (b. 23 August 23, 1817
in
Bucksport) and Sarah Ann (Blodgett) (b. August 24, 1820 in
Bucksport)
Hincks who were married August 23, 1839. To the blessed union was born
four
boys: William B. (b. Sep. 8, 1841); Edward Y. (b. Aug. 13, 1844);
Enoch
P. (b: Dec. 22, 1846); and John (b. 1849) Hincks – all born on the
family
farm in Bucksport, Hancock County, Maine.
Enoch Pond Hincks older brother, William
Bliss Hincks, (Sgt.
Major W.B. Hincks) was Bridgeport’s most-celebrated Civil War
hero. After
moving to Bridgeport with his family William established a career for
himself
as a writer, and on July 22, 1862 he enlisted in the 14th Connecticut
Infantry
as the unit’s adjutant (aka secretary).
W.B. Hincks was present at many of the major
Civil
War battles and on December 1, 1864 received the Congressional
Medal of
Honor for his actions at the Battle of Gettysburg. After the war, he
returned
home and established a book business in partnership with Hobart
Brinsmade,
under style of Brinsmade & Hincks, purchasing his partner’s
interests in
1871. He was interested in American history and contributed to many of
the
nation’s leading magazines (Harpers, Hearth & Home) and in 1876
wrote 'Bridgeport
and Vicinity in the Revolution and the War of 1812'.
In later life Hincks became one of
Bridgeport’s most
respected citizens, serving on the boards of a large number of
Bridgeport
businesses in his capacity as treasurer of the City Savings Bank of
Bridgeport.
He was a good friend of P.T. Barnum and helped him found the Barnum
Museum and
Bridgeport Hospital. Following the great showman’s death on April 8,
1891, he
served as co-executor of Barnum’s estate which amounted to more than $5
million
at the time.
The 1870 US Census lists William’s
less-celebrated brother, Enoch
P. Hicks, as a ‘clerk in carriage shop’, one history of Bridgeport
states he
was in the lumber business starting in 1862.
At the time of the 1870 Census Enoch and his
wife Cornelia
lived with William B. Hincks (his occupation ‘inspector of customs’)
and his
wife, Mary Louise (Hart) Hincks (William and Mary were married on
September 11,
1866). Coincidentally the Hincks brothers married sisters, their
parents being
Baldwin (b.1815) and Charlotte J.W. (b.1821) Hart, farmers who lived
in
Madison Township, New Haven County, Connecticut. Mary L. Hart was born
in 1843,
Cornelia E. Hart in 1848.
Enoch married Cornelia Emmarine Hart, sister
of his eldest
brother's wife, on Oct. 5, 1869 and to the blessed union was born 3
children;
Annie Hart (b. May 22 1872), Henry Winslow (b. Dec. 13 1875), and
Cornelia
Baldwin (b. March 12, 1882) Hincks.
Enoch and William’s business partner (and the firm's president), George
Huntington
Nicholls Johnson (b. Jan. 8, 1844-d.May 12, 1928), was a sixth
generation
representative of the old Nicholls family who came to the New World in
1635 and
at one time owned much of Bridgeport and the surrounding area.
He was born in Brooklyn, New York on January
8, 1844 to William
Sumner and Ann Eliza (Nicholls) Johnson. William Sumner Johnson, a
native of
Oneida county, New York, was for many years a leading wholesale
hardware and
dry goods merchant in New York City.
In December of 1849, the family removed to
Bridgeport, where
George attended the public schools, after which he attended Columbia
College. After
graduation he embarked upon a business career in Manhattan, later
serving as
treasurer of the Moore Car Wheel Co. of Jersey City, New Jersey.
On April 15, 1868, Johnson married Mary Emma
Webster, of New
York City, and to the blessed union was born two children, Annie
Webster and
Mary W. Johnson (the latter became the wife of Dr. T. L. Ellis).
Johnson was a
sporting enthusiast and is recorded as importing a two wheel bicycle or
‘bone
shaker’ from Paris in 1869.
In 1868 he returned to Bridgeport, the 1870
US Census giving
his occupation as treasurer of the White Mfg. Co., 95 Cannon St.,
Bridgeport, a
manufacturer of brass and silver hearse, coach and carriage lamps. The White Mfg. Co. can
trace its history to 1832 when it was organized as Rippen &
Sturges. That
firm was succeeded by George Rippen who sold the operation
to White and
Bradley in 1846. It was succeeded by Thomas P. White & Company in
1853 which in turn was reorganized in 1861 as a $40,000 joint stock
company
called the White Manufacturing Company. In addition to its own
well-established lines of hearse lamps and hardware it supplied firms
such as
Brewster & Co. with private label carriage lamps and accessories.
Known
suppliers of Brewster & Co. lamps include the Abraham P. DeVoursney
Co.
(later DeVoursney Bros.), Broome St., New York City, and the White Mfg.
Co.
Although the White Mfg. Co.'s Cannon St. factory burned
to the ground
on November 1, 1879, they were soon back in business, the October 23,
1881
Boston Daily Globe reporting:
“The White Manufacturing Company,
Bridgeport, Conn., is
manufacturing fine carriage lamps and mountings of every description,
running
full time with about fifty hands, and have increased business by about
25 per
cent.”
At that time White Mfg. Co.’s officers
included: George H.N.
Johnson, President; William B. Hincks, Treasurer; H. S. Wilmot,
Secretary; and Thomas
Boudren, Superintendent. Early listings
(pre-fire)
give 95 Cannon St. as an address, later listings give 155 Cannon St.
Coincidentally, the Blue Ribbon Auto and
Carriage Co. was located directly across
the street at 130-70 Cannon St.
The 1880 US Census lists George H. N.
Johnson in Bridgeport,
occupation carriage builder, with a wife Mary E., and two daughters;
Annie W.
& Mary W. Johnson.
Hincks & Johnson were one of a handful
of firms that
specialized in building heavy carriages, their most popular item being
the
Hansom Cab, a fact revealed in the April 29, 1882 issue of Scientific
American:
“Hansom Cabs.
“The first, extensive introduction and use
of Hansom cabs in
this country is to take place in Philadelphia, Pa., in a short time, by
the
Pennsylvania Railroad Company. The cabs are to be constructed in the
best
manner after the English pattern, and a contract for thirty has been
given to
the enterprising Connecticut firm of carriage builders,
Messrs. Hincks
& Johnson. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company intend by means
of these
cabs to transport passengers from their new depot to various parts of
the city
at a very low price.
“The experiment will be watched with
interest, and, if
successful, will probably lead to the extensive introduction of these
cabs in
other cities.”
Two year later the same publication,
(Scientific American)
mentioned the partner’s improved cab in its November 8, 1884 issue:
“An Improved Cab Carriages with the driver's
seat behind
after the style the English hansom have never been very popular in
country
although a great variety of two wheeled has been introduced within the
past two
or three years our leading carriage manufacturers have however
competing to see
which could build the best vehicle of kind and one that would at the
same time
take the fancy One of the latest inventions m this line is a wheeled
vehicle
recently patented by Messrs. E. P. and G.H. Johnson of Bridgeport,
Conn. The
front is projecting one and presents a three sided figure the being
straight
and the doors on the sides forming an therewith opening toward the
wheels the
side springs being so arranged that the doors may be readily opened
without
interference The springs extend beyond the of the doors to near the
front of
the wheels and are supported at their forward ends by goose necks
attached to
rocker frame of the carriage The vehicle is low hung so far forward on
the axle
that with the driver's seat raged behind it makes a well-balanced as
well as
very convenient and easy riding carriage and one which presents an
extremely
neat and attractive appearance.”
Hincks & Johnson Hansom cabs were
popular with Manhattan
hacks as revealed by the following list of chattel mortgages (aka
installment
loans) issued by Hincks & Johnson’s Manhattan branch during the
week of
September 28, 29, & October 1, 2, 3, 4, 1900, as reported in the
October 6,
1900 Real Estate Record and Builder’s Guide:
“Colton J.J., 206 W. 18th - Hincks & J. Cab
$675
Cornish H.G., 111 E. 82d - Hincks & J. Cab
$1,575
Nelson O.S., 205-207 E. 38th - Hincks & J.
Cab $800
O’Connell W.P., 122-124 W. 54th - Hincks &
J. Cab $225
O’Hara Kate, 207-209 E. 38th - Hincks & J.
Cab $775
Rankin J.W., 338 W. 25th - Hincks & J. Cab
$775”
That particular week was a good one for the
firm, in most
other weeks during the year Hincks & Johnson issued only from one
to three
chattel mortgages. If you interpolate the sales, its Manhattan branch
was
selling approximately 150 taxicabs per annum at about $1,700 per
vehicle. The
same
publication also records occasional liens on the firm’s carriages, but
at a far
diminished frequency.
August 18, 1888 New York Times:
“TURNING TO CLEVELAND.; A CARRIAGE
MANUFACTURER WHO CANNOT
STAY IN THE PROTECTION CAMP.
“BRIDGEPORT, Conn., Aug. 17.--Enoch P.
Hincks, head of the
firm of Hincks Johnson, the largest carriage manufacturers in Western
Connecticut and always a Republican, has come out squarely for
Cleveland and
tariff reform, as he made known very plainly in a speech delivered last
evening
before the Bridgeport Democratic Association. He said he voted for
Blaine in
1884, but the Republican platform, declaring for free whisky and
against
lessening taxation on the needs of life, was more than he could stand.
“His careful reading – for 15 years – of the
New York
Tribune had made him a fairly good free trader. ‘In my business,’ said
Mr.
Hincks, ‘the talk about inability to compete with the pauper labor of
Europe is
nonsense. The bodymakers in my factory tell me they made as much by the
piece
in England as here, but they say that our machinery. Our methods, and
our
management are so superior that we can make a carriage in less time
than the
Englishman. Everything we make a carriage with is highly taxed, and we
can never have a fair field for free
competition unless we get our raw materials free of duty. We have never
had any
difficulty with our help. Our labor is better than the foreign labor.
We have a
35 per cent duty on carriages, but we pay $20 a ton on Norway iron, 60
per cent
on cloth, 60 per cent on plate glass, 50 per cent on varnish, and on
through
the list. The removal of the duties on these things would not cheapen
labor,
because with wider markets the tendency would be to increase the demand
for
labor and therefore its price. Why should varnish be protected in the
interest
of labor when scarcely any labor is required to make it, three or four
men
doing the whole work of a factory?’
“He regarded the Mills bill as a very
conservative measure
and wondered that it did not call for sweeping reductions. Several
prominent
Republicans were at the meeting intending to worry Mr. Hincks with
questions,
but not one of them asked a question or attempted to controvert his
arguments,
although invited to do so.”
Another political article in the August 27, 1888
New York Times
states:
“Hincks & Johnson employ nearly 1,000
skilled workmen,
each and all of whom would feel the benefit could the firm have open to
them
the markets of the world for exporting carriages.“
In 1889 Enoch P. Hincks, Bridgeport,
Conn., was made a
member of the Board of Trustees of the Carriage Builders National
Association. E.P. and G.H. Johnson and H.R. Murray, the firm’s chief draughtsman were
also
CBNA members. Hincks was also a trustee of the People's Savings Bank of
Bridgeport. His wife was Cornelia E. (Hart) (b. 1848), three children;
Henry W.
(b. Dec. 13, 1875) Anna H. (b. May 22, 1872) and Cornelia B. (b. Mar.
1882)
Hincks.
During the mid-to-late 1800s the firm and
its two partners were
issued and or assigned 9 US Patents as follows:
Trunk Lid Support - US Pat. 121786 – Filed
Dec. 12, 1871 -
Issued Dec. 12, 1871
Hub Bands - US Pat. 139317 - Filed Mar. 29,
1873 - Issued
May 27, 1873
Tack - US Pat. 170854 - Filed Oct. 4, 1875 -
Issued Dec 7,
1875
Folding Top Carriage - US Pat. 235528 -
Filed Nov. 10, 1880
- Issued Dec. 14, 1880
Sash - US Pat. 260873 - Filed Apr. 27, 1882
- Issued Jul.
11, 1882
Two-Wheeled Vehicle - US Pat. 305187 - Filed
May 8, 1884 -
Issued Sep. 16, 1884
Coach-Hinge - US Pat. 348212 - Filed Apr. 5,
1886 - Issued
Aug. 31, 1886
Carriage Top (J.G. Carpenter) - US Pat.
448931 - Filed Oct.
25, 1890 - Issued Mar. 24, 1891
Door Opener (C.J. Rishor) US Pat. 493520 -
Filed Sep. 9,
1892 - Issued Mar. 14, 1893
The ‘Horses, Traps, and Drivers’ column of
the April 8, 1894
New York Times inclded a glowing review of one of the firm's new Hansoms:
“A Hansom cab that exited a deal of
admiration yesterday was
the new one belonging to the Imperial Hotel outfit. It has a black
body, with
yellow running gear striped with black, the wheels having rubber tires.
The
trimmings are of a light drab, the lamps ornate and ornamented with
gilt, and
the whole outfit neat as that of any private cab. The builders are
Hincks &
Johnson of Bridgeport. Markart of Twenty-third Street owns the trap.”
The November 1895 issue of The Horseless Age
reveals that
Hincks & Johnson supplied the coachwork for the short-lived De La
Vergne motor
carriage, one of the nation's pioneering automobile manufacturers:
“At the De La Vergne Refrigerating Machine
Company's Works:
“The De La Vergne Refrigerating Machine
Company has created
a special oil engine department under the management of Mr. George
Richmond and
expects to have ready for the market at an early date some 20 sizes of
these
engines, up to 40 horse-power.
“While the Hornsby-Akroyd engines are being
prepared for the
market, the De La Vergne Co. are building four motor wagons propelled
by
regular horizontal gas engines. Two of these may be described as
hunting traps,
and the other two are drags in somewhat modified form.
“The hunting traps, which are of the very
newest design, are
equipped with single cylinder motors, having two pistons. This novel
departure
in gas engine construction which is an invention of Mr. Richmond is
said to
reduce to a minimum the vibration or pulsation experienced in many
motor wagons.
“The weight of the traps is 1,500 pounds
each and they have
a seating capacity for four with abundant room for baggage and hunting
equipment. They were built specially for rough use on all kinds of
roads
by Hincks & Johnson, of Bridgeport, Ct.
“The two drags are slightly heavier,
weighing 1,800 pounds
each, and having three seats, accommodate 6 or even 8 persons.
“These wagons have the ordinary fifth wheel
though the
steering wheels are pivoted at the hub as in the hunting traps. They
were built
for park use and summer touring by Valentine Linn & Son,
carriage
builders, Brooklyn, N. Y.
“The lamps on all these wagons are lighted
by electricity
generated by the motor, and the wheels which are respectively 36 and 48
inches,
are fitted with the solid rubber tires of the Rubber Tire Wheel Co.
“The De La Vergne motor and gearing are
built in an iron frame,
around which the wagon or carriage maker constructs his vehicle. This
frame can
easily be used for any style of vehicle.”
Although it’s totally forgotten today, as
late as 1911 the
De La Vergne Motor Wagon was mentioned alongside the Duryea Motor Wagon
as being
one of the nation’s first. Patrick Robertson writing in his 1911
edition of ‘Robertson’s
Book of Firsts:
“While the Duryea Motor Wagon Co. of
Springfield.,
Mass., is generally acknowledged as the founder of the American auto
industry,
it should be noted that there were other firms that began producing
gasoline-engine cars that year, 1895. One was G. Edgar Allen, a
carriage
builder resident in Englewood, N.J., who established a motor
manufactory at 304
West 53rd Street in New York City, which survived until 1900; while
elsewhere
in the city, on 138th Street, the De La Vergne Refrigerating Co,
completed its
first four production vehicles, two single-cylinder traps and two
twin-cylinder
drags, In December. That month the company reported that it had orders
from
such luminaries of the financial world as John Jacob Astor, William
Waldorf
Astor, William Rockefeller, George Gould. Edwin Gould, and William
Havemeyer,
as well as beer barons Jacob Rupert of New York and Fred Pabst of
Milwaukee.
Building of cars to fulfill these and other orders was subcontracted
to Hincks & Johnson of Bridgeport, Conn., and Valentine,
Linn
& Son of Brooklyn. Production was abruptly halted on the death of
the
company founder, John Chester De La Vergne in May of 1896. Meanwhile in
Harvey,
Illinois the Chicago Motor Vehicle Co., which despite its name also
built
horse-drawn carriages, was boasting of its factory capacity for a
hundred
vehicle weekly. It continued making cars for four years before
switching to
motor buses and delivery vans. The company went bankrupt in 1904.”
One
of the images sent out by the de La Vergne Co. depicting one of their
motor hunting traps was in fact lifted from an earlier issue of The
Hub, who was none too pleased. Their January 1896 issue called
attention to the fact as follows:
“HORSELESS VEHICLE HUMBUGS.
“During the recent gathering of
horseless vehicle
experimentalists at Chicago an organization was formed, having for its
purpose
the encouragement of the manufacture of horseless vehicles. Under the
present
circumstances this movement was a good one, and I he organization
cannot get
down to business too soon, as they have two serious obstacles to
overcome. The
first is the mechanical difficulties, and the second is the closing of
the
mouths and stopping the publication of so much arrant bosh as is now
going the
rounds of the press. This is bad enough when appearing in the columns
of
journals that make no pretense of mechanical or technical knowledge,
but when
seen in those that from their titles would appear to be entitled to
recognition
as mechanical publications they become serious obstacles in the path of
the
inventor, as they lead to ridicule from the general public, and thus
lose the
encouragement necessary to their introduction.
“The latest burlesques in this direction
recently appeared in
a journal which aims to reflect the true situation as to motor
vehicles. Among
the drawings shown are many that are crude and ridiculous, but this
might be
excused under the circumstances, as about every patent crank in the
country has
reached the conclusion that he is the Moses who will lead the horseless
vehicles out of the wilderness, and the Patent Office is being deluged
with
crude drawings which mean nothing, and it becomes necessary to fall
back upon
these freaks; but when recourse is had to the mutilating
of The Hub's Fashion
Plates, one is led to doubt the truth of any of the reproductions. We
reprint
herewith a mutilated cut, the original of which appeared in the May
number of The Hub. As
will be seen, the wheelhouse has been filled in with a pen and a post,
and what
is intended for a wheel placed forward of the driver's seat, and the
improvised
vehicle is dubbed a "Motor Hunting Trap," are accredited to
the "De la Vergne Refrigerating Machine Co., New York." We are not
willing to believe that the company will claim that they have produced
such a
trap, in view of the fact that the artist (?) who made the alterations
failed
to show any connection between the power, (wherever that may be stored)
and the
wheels. It is possible, however, that he had some doubts about the
ability of
the motor to propel the vehicle, and he therefore left the platform
gear with
its draw bar and pole loop, so that a team of old fashioned horses
could be
used when the motor failed. He failed also to
remove The Hub's imprint,
thereby making us responsible for the crude alterations and the
omission of
mechanical devices. The selection of a good design from our columns is
creditable to his good taste, but the alterations as shown don't
improve it, or
advance the interest of the horseless vehicle.”
A freak accident suffered by George H.N.
Johnson during early
1904 was carried in the national papers, the March 25, 1904 Lowell Sun
reporting:
“HIS ARM BROKEN; MAN SWAM DISTANCE OF 100
YARDS.
“BRIDGEPORT, Conn., March 25 - George H. N.
Johnson, Junior
member of the firm of Hincks & Johnson, carriage manufacturers,
fell asleep
while returning to this city from New York Wednesday night and when the
train reached here at 12;30 he
failed to awake. While the train was pulling out of the city, however,
he was
aroused by the brakeman's announcement
that the next stop would be New Haven and he rushed, half dazed, out of
the car to find that the
train was just going over the rolling lift bridge. A jolt of the train
threw
him off the car platform and he landed on the ties, sustaining a
compound
fracture of the right arm. Then he rolled off the bridge into the
harbor, and
the shock of the sudden bath restored him completely to consciousness.
“Swimming with his left arm for 100 yards or
more, he
reached the fender piling of the bridge and rested there for an hour
until his
cries for help were heard by the crew of a freight train which had
stopped on
the bridge.
“How to rescue him was a puzzle to the
trainmen, but Johnson
had a plan. By his direction the rolling lift was opened so that the
counter-weights which drop toward the water were just above his head.
He was
not quite able to reach the bridge even them, but by attaching a ladder
to the
lower part of the structure he was able to crawl to the counter-weights
and on
this impromptu lever was brought to safety.
“He was carried to the railroad station in a
freight car.
When he reached there he refused to have an ambulance called, but took
a cab
for his home, where a physician attended him.
“Mr. Johnson is 50 years old and a 33d
degree Mason.
Yesterday he was fairly comfortable, though pneumonia was threatened.”
Hincks &
Johnson's factory was destroyed by fire on April 9, 1906, the May 1906 Carriage Monthly reporting:
“Serious Fire Loss.
“The carriage factory of Hincks &
Johnson, Bridgeport, Conn., was destroyed by fire April 9th; loss
estimated at $50,000. The damage was confined entirely to the portion
of the
plant devoted to manufacturing all kinds of vehicles, and the flames
did not
reach the large repository south of the shops where some $50,000 worth
of
finished vehicles were stored. The loss is covered by insurance.”
Many of the firm's craftsmen found temporary employment at the Bridgeport
Vehicle Co., and the May 1908 issue of The Hub inferred that Hincks & Johnson were out of business for good:
“HINCKS & JOHNSON MAY DISCONTINUE
“In connection with the revival of the rumor
that the old
firm of Hincks & Johnson, the well-known carriage manufacturers of
Bridgeport, Conn., intend to go out of business, Enoch P. Hincks,
senior member
of the firm, practically confirmed the report recently, when he said
that
nothing definite had been decided upon, but that neither he nor Mr.
Johnson
cared to continue in business much longer. ‘We are both getting along
in
years,’ said Mr. Hincks. ‘We have no plans for the future.’
“This firm has had many years of a
prosperous trade and its
reputation among the trade is of the best. At different times during
the past
ten years there have been reports of the sale of the firm’s valuable
property
in Bridgeport.”
The July 1908 issue of The Hub cornfirming:
“CARRIAGE CONCERN TO STOP BUSINESS
“The affairs of Hincks & Johnson,
Bridgeport, Conn., one
of the oldest carriage making concerns in the country, are about to be
wound up
and the firm will go out of business after more than half a century.
Several
Bridgeport and out of town parties have made offers for the business
and it may
be sold.”
The
February 1909 issue of Carriage Monthly stated that they were
consdiereing a return to business, but confirmation is lacking:
“It is understood that Hincks & Johnson
have had plans
prepared for a large new three story block to take the place of their
carriage
factory at the corner of Broad and Cannon Streets, Bridgeport, Conn.
The
present building will be torn down and work on the new building will be
begun
as soon as possible.”
A Hincks & Johnson Hansom Cab is in the
collection of
the Shelburne Museum, Shelburne, Vermont.
Hincks & Johnson’s management elected to
withdraw from
business after a devastating fire destroyed the firm’s factory in April
of
1906. At the time of the fire Hincks & Johnson were constructing
wooden
automobile coachwork for Locomobile, and the contracts were fulfilled
at the
Bridgeport Vehicle Company (1906-1911) using craftsmen formerly
employed at the
Hincks & Johnson plant.
Initially established as an automobile
garage, the Bridgeport
Vehicle Co. entered into the manufacture of automobiles bodies after a
fire
destroyed Bridgeport’s Hincks & Johnson carriage works in April of
1906.
Hincks & Johnson’s management elected to withdraw from business and
a core
group of their body craftsmen went to
work for the Bridgeport Vehicle Co. At the time of the fire Hincks
&
Johnson were constructing coachwork for Locomobile, and the contracts
were
fulfilled at the Bridgeport Vehicle Company’s facility.
The September 1, 1907 issue of the Cycle and
Automobile
Trade Journal included a picture of an attractive body built for a
Bridgeport
businessman on a Locomobile chassis:
“Limousine body made by the Bridgeport
Vehicle Co. for Mr.
E.G. Burnham of the firm of Eaton Cole & Burnham, Bridgeport, Conn.
“Bridgeport Automobile Bodies
“The Bridgeport Vehicle Body Co.,
Bridgeport, Conn., was
formed over a year ago by Mr. Harry D. Miller, and seven practical body
makers
who have been connected with one of the largest carriage manufacturing
concerns
in the State of Connecticut. The company builds a line of high-grade
Limousines, Landaulets, Victorias and Touring bodies of every
description.
“They make a specialty of limousine and
touring, car body
work. The bodies are constructed of selected, thoroughly seasoned stock
and are
assembled by skilled workmen. The painting may be of any combination of
colors;
upholstering may be of morocco, satin or broadcloth. The bodies are
furnished
with an equipment usually found in high-grade work, such as clock,
toilet case,
card case, megaphone or speaking tube, roll up silk curtains inside,
sliding or
revolving seats, dome electric light, etc. All outside fittings are of
best
quality brass. Inside appointments may be of brass or silver finish.
Side lamps
wired for electric lights are furnished, if desired. The body is
supplied with
storm front, folding into top when not in use.
“The bodies are made in both wood and
aluminum. This concern
has also a special top department where they build tops to order; also,
wind
shields, slip covers, lamp covers, etc.”
The ‘one of the largest carriage
manufacturing concerns in
the State of Connecticut’ mentioned in the article refers to Hincks
&
Johnson, a well-known Bridgeport heavy carriage manufacturer that was
winding
down its operations at the time, having suffered a devastating fire the
previous April that was mentioned in the May 1906 issue of Carriage
Monthly:
“Serious Fire Loss.
“The carriage factory of Hinks &
Johnson, Bridgeport, Conn., was destroyed by fire April 9th; loss
estimated at $50,000. The damage was confined entirely to the portion
of the
plant devoted to manufacturing all kinds of vehicles, and the flames
did not
reach the large repository south of the shops where some $50,000 worth
of
finished vehicles were stored. The loss is covered by insurance.”
The following item published in the January
14, 1909 issue
of The Automobile erroneously states the firm was ‘one of the largest
of the
fine coach builders, no doubt a reference to Hinks & Johnson,
which
was corporately unrelated, although they shared many of the same
employees:
“Body Builders Prosperous. —
The Bridgeport Vehicle Company, one of
the largest of the
fine coach builders, which made Bridgeport, Conn., famous for
this
kind of work, has recently turned its attention to the construction of
automobile bodies. So successful has it been in this line that the
plant at
Water street and South avenue has been outgrown. To provide for present
and
future needs ground has been broken at Fairfield and Holland avenues
for a
three-story brick building 88 by 160. This handsome structure is
expected to be
completed, ready for occupancy, July 1, when it is expected that the
present
force of seventy men will be doubled. The officers of the company, with
a
showroom for the displaying of six cars, will be in the Fairfield
avenue side
of the building. The concern will install its own power plant and an
elevator.
The officers of the company are: President and treasurer, Harry D.
Miller; vice-president, H. F. Brandes; secretary, George C.
Miller.”
Although Locomobile
never built their own bodies they encouraged their
dealerships to imply that they did to their customers. Most were
constructed by Bridgeport firms located within driving distance of the
plant, who would receive the chassis after they passed inspection at
the Locomobile factory.
After a short road test
the bare chassis would be equipped with a temporary seat and
driven
down the road to either the Bridgeport Body Works,
Bridgeport Vehicle Company (successor to Hincks & Johnson) or the
Blue
Ribbon Body to have
its coachwork installed. Popular body styles would normally be built in
advance, although full custom jobs might take as many as 3 months to
complete.
Surviving bodies include small
plaques attached by the body builder to the threshold of the driver’s
door indicating its
style and or
production number. Unfortunately precise identification of the builder
is
difficult as they were not allowed to imprint their name on the plaque.
Many of
these body number plaques remain today but there are no known records
indicating the body builder’s origin.
Known Locomobile production body builders inlude
the following:
Currier, Cameron & Co., Shields Carriage
Co., James N.
Leitch Carriage Co., Briggs Carriage Co. - all Amesbury, Mass.
New Haven Carriage Co., New Haven, Conn.
J.B. Judkins Co., Merrimac, Mass.
Willoughby Co., Utica, New York
McFarlan Automobile Co.; Connersville,
Indiana
Bridgeport Vehicle Co., Bellamore Armored
Car & Equipment Co., Blue Ribbon Body Co., Bridgeport Body Co. (aka
Bridgeport Body Works); Henry Killam, Hincks & Johnson - all
Bridgeport,
Conn.
Bodies built for the Locomobile’s custom
body program,
instituted in 1914 after the hiring of the brilliant designer J. Frank
de Causse, were supplied by Judkins,
Fleetwood, Holbrook, Derham, Locke, Willoughby and Healey & Co.
Tags after
1914 often identify the builder; eg. ‘Designed by
Locomobile Custom Body Dpt.”
and “Healey & Co. Builders New York’
“EDWARD LOVER, who is president and a
member of the
board of directors of the Lover Top & Converter Company, Inc.,
of
Buffalo, engaged in the manufacture of a patented convertible
automobile top
which is his own invention, is one of the notably successful business
men of
this city. Born in Fairfield, Connecticut, son of George E., and Carrie
(Distel) Lover, Mr. Lover received his early education in the
public
schools of his native city, supplementing this with two terms in the
Evening
High School of Buffalo, and one year in the Buffalo Evening Technical
School,
where he studied mechanical drawing and mathematics. While still a boy,
he
began his business career in the employee of a manufacturing chemist in
New York
City, continuing that connection until he went to Bridgeport,
Connecticut,
where he learned the trade of coach body builder, in association with
Hincks
& Johnson. When his trade was learned, he became identified with
the
Locomobile Company as a body builder, and here he remained for a period
of nine
years, gaining valuable experience and rendering faithful service.”
Hincks & Johnson remained involved with
the operation of
the White Manufacturing Co. long after their carriage building business
was
discontinued. The firm’s listing in the
1910 Bridgeport Board of Trade’s Year Book reveals they were now
producing
lamps for automobiles:
“White Manufacturing Co., Cannon Street.
President, Thomas
Boudren, Bridgeport; treasurer and secretary, Horace S. Wilmot, of
Bridgeport; assistant
treasurer and assistant secretary, S.M. Middlebrook, Bridgeport.
Directors:Enoch P. Hincks, of Bridgeport; George H.N. Johnson, of
Bridgeport; S.M.
Middlebrook. Lamps., coach lamps, and automobile mountings.”
The White Mfg. Co.’s decades-long career as a
carriage, hearse and automobile
lamp and hardware manufacturer came to an end in late 1919 when the
firm’s
factory was destroyed by fire, the November 3, 1919 Bridgeport Standard
Telegram reporting:
“A fire on Saturday evening burned out the
upper stories of
the White Manufacturing company on Cannon street, occasioning a loss
that the
company estimates at $20,000 and which is covered by insurance. The
cause of
the fire is not known, but the company, which manufactures large amount
of
coach lamps and carriage trimmings, had considerable varnish and oil
and other
flammable matter in their factory which made a hot fire. The firemen
did well
and finally go the fire under control. The White Company will rebuild
their
factory, and will not be forced to suspend operations for long.”
Although the firm remained in business for a
couple more
years the February 17, 1925 issue of the Bridgeport Telegram reveals
they had
recently withdrawn from business:
“NOTICE TO CREDITORS OF THE WHITE
MANUFACTURING COMPANY.
“Notice is hereby given that every
stockholder of White
Manufacturing Company, a Connecticut corporation located at Bridgeport,
Connecticut. Has signed and duly acknowledged an agreement that the
corporate
existence of the White Manufacturing Company be terminated pursuant to
the
general corporation laws of the State of Connecticut. All claims
against said
Company will be barred unless presented in writing to Charles O.
Mathews, 155
Cannon Street, Bridgeport, on or before June 14th, 1925.
“Directors of White Manufacturing Company
acting as Trustees
in Dissolution, by C.O. MATHEWS, their duly appointed agent.”
The August 7, 1925 Bridgeport Telegram
contained the
following classified advertisement:
“FACTORY FOR SALE
“The White Mfg. Co. building, 155 Cannon
St., 4-story brick
building, 12,000 sq. ft. floor space, elevator and boiler, 75 foot
frontage on
Cannon St. For particulars address C.O. Matthews. c/o White Mfg. Co.,
Bridgeport, Conn.”
© 2012 Mark Theobald - Coachbuilt.com
|
|
|